Why Bother Replacing 2D Drawings with 3D Models?

Yes, why would you want to replace 2D drawings? Clearly, 2D Drawings have their own advantages. But there are disadvantages to 2D Drawings. Let’s consider a couple of scenarios.

Quick Links

Visualization
More information
PTC Creo View MCAD
Product page
PTC Creo View ECAD
Product details

One, the drawing gets recreated possibly many times in most companies for various reasons. This amounts to the additional duplicated effort required in creating a 2D drawing from a 3D model. The second scenario is the use of pen and paper based verification of the design intent. Traditionally, different marker pens have been used to “markup” the drawing to communicate the changes needed. These changes are lost when the design iterates. But what if you had a mechanism to track who said what and when was it said? Wouldn’t be that valuable? It is also a step towards replacing 2D drawings with intelligent 3D models.

A first step to replacing a 2D drawing is to ensure that the design intent present on the drawing is represented accurately and unambiguously in the 3D model. Typically, the design intent is captured in PTC Creo or other CAD tools such as CATIA V5.

The picture below shows design intent being captured in PTC Creo Parametric:

Madhavi1

The next step is to publish the design intent for use by the downstream users. PTC Creo View provides a mechanism to publish most of the design intent from PTC Creo Parametric and CATIA V5 into the PVZ format (viewable file). The software allows for selective publishing of geometry, dimensions, tolerances and view states from PTC Creo Parametric or capture states from CATIA V5. This means that you can protect the intellectual property by restricting the information contained in the viewable file. The picture below shows the design intent published from PTC Creo Parametric.

Madhavi2

Once the published 3D model is available, the downstream user can easily interact and interrogate the data on demand. PTC Creo View has an intuitive interface to work with model based design data. The Microsoft-like user interface makes it easier for users to find and use program capabilities. The overall look and feel of the applications has been streamlined. The user cannot only visualize and but also take quick measurements. The picture below shows the viewable file accessed from within PTC Creo View.

Madhavi3

Design Checking
Moving to 3D also allows you to take advantage of many more capabilities within the PTC Creo View suite of products. One such area is the design checking process. Historically, the design checker role within the company would review the 2D drawing and call out any discrepancies. A set of colored markup pens are used to highlight the problem areas. This redlining of drawings has traditionally been a pen and paper-based process.

Capture

But with PTC Creo View Design Check, the markup/redlining process can now be very efficient as every critical dimension and tolerance present in the model can be digitally verified for accuracy and unambiguous definition. Any discrepancies found can be captured as markups in the tool for later retrieval. One of the significant capabilities of this tool is the storage, management and the traceability of these markups. As the design iterates, all the knowledge that went into the decision making is easily available at any point in time. Also, the visual dashboard provides a quick status of the design in terms of who said what, when it was said. It also demonstrates the “why” as shown in the picture below.

Madhavi5

This post covered the some of the considerations for replacing 2D Drawings. While the idea of replacing of 2D Drawings sounds good, there are a number of barriers to the wholesale adoption of 3D models across the enterprise. Some of them include the Cultural readiness, Technology readiness, Contractual obligations, etc. Replacing 2D Drawings is a journey and more & more companies are embarking on this journey. A question: Are you considering to replace 2D Drawings at your company? Let me know your thoughts.

Madhavi RameshAbout the author: Madhavi Ramesh is the founder of Punditas, a Product Intelligence company. She has over two and half decades of experience in the development of software solutions for Research, Engineering and Manufacturing organizations worldwide. She has extensive experience in Defining, Developing and Deploying Products in CAD/CAM/PLM/Visualization/SLM areas for Aerospace, Defense, Automotive, Medical Device and Heavy Equipment companies. She is a Six Sigma Green belt certified Professional. Ms. Ramesh was the Product Management Director at PTC responsible for the Product Management of PTC’s Creo View product suite until recently. Visit her Visualization blog (www.vizpundit.com) for tips and tricks on PTC Visualization technology.

This entry was posted in Creo Technology, Reinventing Design and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

2 Comments

  1. Keir Pritchard
    Posted Jul 21, 2014 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    I’m not sure that 2D Drawings will (or should) ever be eliminated.

    2D Drawings, effectively done provide a clear and concise presentation of the necessary information. (I did notice that your viewable probably would not have made it through checking because of overlapping information). Interrogating models leaves room for errors and omissions. The 2D Drawing in paper or paper equivalent (PDF) form also forms a contractual basis for procurement.

    That being said, a 3D “model as basis” for Design is much more effective means of communicating complex information such as an as-cast shape than a 2D Drawing could be and castings are an example of where an entire industry is moving towards a 3D model providing a nominal definition. More than likely, there is a 2D Drawing stating that the 3D model is definition of the nominal shape with the addition of casting tolerances, material requirements, heat treat etc.

    The answer for the foreseeable future, in my opinion is a Hybrid of both that would be highly dependent on the sophistication of the information consumers. We’re still a long way off from big screen terminials and gesture driven UI’s in every machine/fabrication/assembly shop, not because of technology capability (that’s probably pretty close) but because of adoption.

    • Posted Jul 22, 2014 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

      Thanks Keir for your feedback. I agree with your comments about 2D Drawings and the hybrid world of Drawings and Models that we will live in for a quite some time. Although the technology bits for enabling a Model Based Enterprise is available today, it is not all integrated and streamlined as one would like. The bigger challenge is the technology adoption as you have pointed out.

      With regards to your comment about the “overlapping information in the viewable” – the picture in my post does look cluttered but in reality, I think it isn’t that bad. That’s because the data is typically organized into ViewStates (PTC Creo Parametric) or CaptureStates (CATIA V5). The downstream user gets to see the information that’s tailored for his/her use. Also, being able to interact with the 3D Model in real time and using the display filters in PTC Creo View helps with understanding and checking the design.
      Madhavi

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <pre> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Archives

  • Connect with PTC Creo